Let's Talk is a weekly meme hosted by Melissa at i swim for oceans
Do you like issue-driven books? Why, or why not?
As is typical with me, this is not an easy Yes or No question. Though I guess my initial answer would be YES I do like issue-driven books. Most contemporary fiction includes a main character with an issue that s/he is dealing with. I read and like a lot of these books, so I guess that in itself answers the question pretty simply. Although, I do understand that there is a difference between a contemporary romance with a side of issue and a true issue-driven book (where the story is more about a character facing something than it is about her finding someone).
But even when I read a true issue-driven book, I want to get something good out of the struggle and pain that my character is facing (It's not worth the pain, unless I gain. Yes, I realize that's super cheesy.). Usually the gain comes in the form of a romance. I like when the MC meets someone while s/he works through her issues (let's face it, it's usually a "her" narrating the story) - and a love story develops in the process. I'm also going to admit here that I prefer positive endings. That means that I want my characters to face their issues and move beyond them by the end of the novel (and often fall in love in the process). Thankfully, this is what happens in most issue books. I will admit, though that there are always exceptions to the rule. Sometimes a love story or happy ending isn't necessary or appropriate.
Honestly, though what bugs me most about issue-driven books is the standard plot line that regularly accompanies them. Let me lay it out for you:
When the story begins, we meet a girl. This girl has some issues that need to be dealt with before she can get on with her life. As she starts to face these issues, she meets a guy. Sometimes he has issues too. Through her interactions with said guy, she starts to deal with these issues of hers. But as soon as their relationship begins to click into place, something happens that tears them apart. Usually this Thing happens about 80% of the way (give or take a few percentages) into the story, and involves someone doing something stupid or a big misunderstanding. Although it breaks up the happy couple, this Thing is most often used as a catalyst for the heroine finally dealing with her issues. And after that happens, the couple gets back together again = happy ending.
When the story begins, we meet a girl. This girl has some issues that need to be dealt with before she can get on with her life. As she starts to face these issues, she meets a guy. Sometimes he has issues too. Through her interactions with said guy, she starts to deal with these issues of hers. But as soon as their relationship begins to click into place, something happens that tears them apart. Usually this Thing happens about 80% of the way (give or take a few percentages) into the story, and involves someone doing something stupid or a big misunderstanding. Although it breaks up the happy couple, this Thing is most often used as a catalyst for the heroine finally dealing with her issues. And after that happens, the couple gets back together again = happy ending.
Guys, I can see this plot line coming from a mile away. I've gotten to where I get nervous half-way through a book, because I'm just waiting for the Thing to happen. And I'm constantly looking for authors who create conflict or resolve their stories in different ways. But it's not easy to find that, especially since this plot is featured in a lot of other types of books as well - straight romance and some paranormals, too.
In its defense, I will admit that this storyline works, which is why it is used so much. But I've become exhausted from it. I think the root of the problem for me, is that when I recognize this well used plot, I start seeing the book as a formula and less of a story. Does that make sense?
In its defense, I will admit that this storyline works, which is why it is used so much. But I've become exhausted from it. I think the root of the problem for me, is that when I recognize this well used plot, I start seeing the book as a formula and less of a story. Does that make sense?
Is there anyone else who feels this way, or am I a crazy person? (Maybe don't answer the crazy part...)
I apologize for getting a bit off topic this week!